On Weddings, Judge Roberts, and Contemporary Feminism
On Sunday mornings I run for the Weddings section of New York Times. Carrie from Sex and the City called it "the single woman's sport pages," but from what I can tell, it's not just the solo gal who reads it. . . more like the Business section for all women regardless of marital status. Perusing through, I couldn't help but be charmed by the featured couple -- sort of like A.R. Gurney's Love Letters, but with a happier ending.
. . . which leads me to thoughts on John Roberts as a nominee for SCOTUS. My friend M was kind enough to ask my opinion at dinner before the Freakonomics lecture and because I couldn't then say what I wanted to fully, I will do so here: John Roberts will make a fine justice, definitely to the right, but overall fine. He's qualified and regardless of his politics, he's thoughtful, hard-working, and decent. . . especially smart of him not to leave such long a paper trail, eh? What a good Catholic would want to know is why the guy didn't become a priest. D raised the issue of his membership in the Federalist Society, which is nothing more than a networking thing, really. Membership is open to anyone, though it's a truly conservative group, so you'd have to be one (or know one) to feel welcome. This op-ed in the NYT (written by a former Blackmun law clerk currently a professor at my law alma mater) has a cogent and practical take on what's appropriate to ask during the Senate confirmation hearings.
The topics above connect in my mind because I find it interesting how egalitarian and ahem, downright progressive Judge Roberts' marriage appears to be. The judge's wife is a partner at big DC firm. They married in their 40's and apparently adopted kids because they were not having any luck on their own. This is something to note, not for Senate purposes, but personally and professionally, because I have it on good information that fertililty is often an issue for big-firm attorneys of both sexes, in DC and elsewhere. Those guys and gals work so hard, it takes a toll on their personal lives in a very tangible way.
To sum this up, here are my deep thoughts regarding the state of contemporary feminism: Last night I was at a ladies' crafting and fundraising party for a local charity. My friends and I were mostly scrapbooking. Not many of us work outside the home these days, though most had established careers before having kids. What would Jill Ker Conway and other feminists think of us sitting there crafting away doing what is essentially non-paid work? We are the ones who are supposed to be having it all, career, marriage, and family, but we don't seem to, at least not all at once. Whatever happened? Both the men and the women of my generation would love to know.



























